# DataSHIELD disclosure settings - migration of pages to new wiki

**URL:** <https://datashield.discourse.group/t/datashield-disclosure-settings-migration-of-pages-to-new-wiki/966>\
**Category:** Statistical development\
**Tags:** datashield-wiki, disclosure, wiki\
**Created:** [12 March 2024 10:48 UTC](https://datashield.discourse.group/t/datashield-disclosure-settings-migration-of-pages-to-new-wiki/966 "2024-03-12T10:48:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![becca.wilson](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/datashield.discourse.group/becca.wilson/32/14_2.png) [@becca.wilson](https://datashield.discourse.group/u/becca.wilson)\
**Post date:** [12 March 2024 17:43 UTC](https://datashield.discourse.group/t/datashield-disclosure-settings-migration-of-pages-to-new-wiki/966/3 "2024-03-12T17:43:29Z")

</div>

Im just adding here the additional text from Jim’s message which included an example to help readers. This has been truncated from the post somehow.

“e.g. Datashield would release a table of diabetes diagnosis (type1,type2, none) vs some protected characteristic (e.g. ethnic group). With 0 in the ’none’ column for a given group — which discloses the private information that all people in that group had diabetes.”

I will close comment on this duplicate post as the discussion about this topic continues in this post in the Support forum. [Could DataShield be adapted to meet accepted SDC norms?](https://datashield.discourse.group/t/could-datashield-be-adapted-to-meet-accepted-sdc-norms/977)

---

_[View the full topic](https://datashield.discourse.group/t/datashield-disclosure-settings-migration-of-pages-to-new-wiki/966)._
